Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 5070 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 33% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5530 - 150 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5530 - 48 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
343
14.527742481999153%
Multi-Core
1384
7.393557348148939%
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Xeon W |
Gainestown | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |