Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 2346 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 12% better in Resident Evil 4 than Xeon E5520 - 172 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5520 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Gainestown | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
