Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 407 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-4160T - 255 vs 253 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
