Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9370 is 1534 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 80 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5520 - 145 vs 144 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
145
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Gainestown | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 220 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |