Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2698 v3 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2698 v3 is 1062 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4100 - 100 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 95 vs 135 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
