Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 565 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4100 - 125 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
