Buy on Amazon
£118.25
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 128 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£118.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL - CLIENT CPU CORE I5-11400F 2.60GHZ SKTLGA1200 12.00MB CACHE BOXED
Buy for £118.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2697 v2 or Core i5-11400F
Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum
49 FPS
£18.37/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
£899.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
