Buy on Amazon
£50
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 179 vs 153 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
179
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G6900 Desktop Processor 4M Cache, up to 3.4 GHz
Buy for £50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
