Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 18% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 146 vs 124 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2683 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
