Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 28 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 164 vs 154 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15819 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |