Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2683 v3 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2683 v3 is 130 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1840 - 150 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 53 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
132
88%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |