Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 31% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 201 vs 154 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
115 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |