Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700HX outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700HX is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700HX
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 153 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 28 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-14700HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
559
22.191345772131797%
Multi-Core
3843
28.513132512242173%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 10 | Cores | 20 |
| 20 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.5 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
