Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1625 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |