Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 112 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 105 vs 120 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£215
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |