Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 46% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 230 vs 157 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |