Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8300 - 204 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Server/Workstation
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
