Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 37% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2670 - 182 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 65 vs 115 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13712 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |