Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 is 231 days older than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8300 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 95 vs 115 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2670
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
