Buy on Amazon
£29.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1589
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1589
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 848 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron G3930 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
