Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v2 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v2 is 242 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
- Performs up to 28% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1840 - 74 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 53 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
58
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
115 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |