Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 123 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 95 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
