Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 14% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 382 vs 334 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 85 vs 95 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2388G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
