Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 138 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 125 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£465.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |