Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 786 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-2660 - 185 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |