Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2660 v3 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2660 v3 is 454 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-9590 - 199 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 105 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
