Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 454 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - 499 vs 454 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 135 vs 220 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
