Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2353 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 178 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Athlon |
| Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 220 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
