Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 202 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 32 vs 20 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 24 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
