Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 121 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.99/FPS
100%
Price, £
£120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |