Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2369 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2643 - 129 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 32 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2643
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
