Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4242 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 42% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-2640 - 259 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
259
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |