Buy on Amazon
£599
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2239 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 134 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 20 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£599
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for £599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
