Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3326 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 200 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
200
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |