Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 208 vs 195 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£224.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |