Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 172 vs 159 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |