Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630L v3 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630L v3 is 685 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8300 - 196 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
