Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1955 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 112 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.94/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |