Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 105 days older than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700F - 112 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £258.88 vs £328.88
- Up to 19% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9900KF - £2.38 vs £2.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.94/FPS
80%
Price, £
£328.88
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
109
97%
Value, £/FPS
£2.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£258.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |