Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1625 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 196 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
