Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2815 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2620 - 166 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10790 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |