Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 313 days older than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 118 vs 117 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
