Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 90 vs 76 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
