Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 372 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 80 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 97 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 85 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |