Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 21% better in HITMAN 3 than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 227 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
227
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |