Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 80 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 55% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 136 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
