Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 272 days older than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Island 2 than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 117 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 55 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |