Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 235 vs 181 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
235
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£177.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £177.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |