Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 157 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
