Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 362 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
362
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£215
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |